Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /homepages/12/d83843876/htdocs/newlife/wp-content/themes/supernova-pro/lib/functions/supernova-query.php on line 657

Warning: file_get_contents(http://grant-adamson.me.uk/wp-content/themes/supernova-pro/lib/admin/inc/webfonts.json) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /homepages/12/d83843876/htdocs/newlife/wp-content/themes/supernova-pro/lib/functions/supernova-query.php on line 657

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /homepages/12/d83843876/htdocs/newlife/wp-content/themes/supernova-pro/lib/functions/supernova-query.php on line 678

Wordblog revived

incorporating New Life

Moderate, don't write leaders, Jarvis tells newspapers

Nearly a month ago when Jeff Jarvis suggested in a post on his Buzzmachine blog headed “The death of the editorialist” that leader writers were not needed in an “age of open media”, I disagreed with him. Today he returns to the subject in his New Media column in Media Guardian.

He writes:

In this age of open media, when every voice and viewpoint can be heard, when news is analysed and overanalysed, and when we certainly suffer no shortage of opinion, do we still need newspaper leaders and the people who write them? I say no. Or at least, I say, they should join their colleagues in the newsroom in a radical re-examination of their roles in journalism.

He wants the leader writers to become “moderators and enablers of the democratic discussion, no matter where it occurs: in newspapers, on blogs, on television, and now on internet talk-shows like the conservative network 18 Doughty Street”.

Coming from Jarvis, an apostle of journalistic revolution through what many call “citizen journalism” and he has renamed “networked journalism”, this argument is no surprise.

When he writes about America, “where journalists insist that they are objective and that they and their institutions have no point of view,” you begin to see a divide opening up between the two sides of the Atlantic. You just have to look at Martin Newland writing about “editorial ethos” (my previous post) on the facing page, to see the difference.

Newland makes the case for a clear editorial policy. Jarvis rejects it in favour of “the voice of the people”.

Yes, I believe newspapers, in print or on the web, have to have a clear identity. Leaders and the process by which they are written is an essential part of creating that identity. The alternative is homogenised or, as Newland puts it “little more than a wire service” with columnists attached.


View all posts by


No Responses

  1. BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » The death of the editorialist says

    […] Wordblog » Blog Archive » Moderate, don’t write leaders, Jarvis tells newspapers Says: October 23rd, 2006 at 3:32 am […]

  2. Emint Members External Blogs | Emint says

    […] Moderate, don’t write leaders, Jarvis tells newspapers (tags: jarvis newspapers newspaperbusiness newspaperwebsites newspaperblogs networkedjournalism networkmedia networkjournalism) […]

  3. Kristine Lowe says

    and the role of enabler and moderator is hardly a revolutionary new job to those writing or editing their editorial pages: it’s just that in the age before Internet this conversation was narrower, slower and less immediate. I’ve been mulling over all this

  4. cybersoc.com says

    Moderate, don’t write leaders, Jarvis tells newspapers